Jesus would end the war on drugs

““We are called upon to follow Jesus’s example in opposing the war on drugs, which has resulted in the United States becoming the world’s biggest jailer, with about 5 percent of the world’s population and 25 percent of the world’s prisoners”

shuhallpic“Short corridor” in the infamous SHU (Secure Housing Unit) at Pelican Bay State Prison, Del Norte County, California

      Christian leaders issue Easter statement denouncing drug war and mass incarceration of minorities

 by Alfonso Serrano,  Al Jazeera

 

A coalition of Christian leaders, citing the spirit of Holy Week, has called for an end to mass incarceration in the United States. The ministry of Jesus Christ, they say, was about challenging the unjust systems that held marginalized communities in bondage. And they equate that struggle with the fight against the war on drugs, which not only costs billions of dollars, they say, but also results in the disproportionate incarceration of minorities.

“We are called upon to follow Jesus’s example in opposing the war on drugs, which has resulted in the United States becoming the world’s biggest jailer, with about 5 percent of the world’s population and 25 percent of the world’s prisoners,” the Rev. Edwin Sanders, senior servant and founder of the Metropolitan Interdenominational Church in Nashville, Tenn., said in a statement.

The Christian leaders on Wednesday called on the federal government to repeal laws that criminalize low-level drug possession — policies that result in disparate incarceration rates for blacks and Hispanics, studies show. In their place, the federal government should expand drug treatment and other health approaches to drug use, the coalition members said.

The Christian leaders urged Congress to pass the Smarter Sentencing Act. The measure, supported by the Obama administration, would reduce mandatory minimum sentences for some drug offenders and apply more lenient crack cocaine sentencing policies. The House Judiciary Committee is weighing the bill, after the Senate Judiciary Committee approved it in January.

The recommendations come amid growing mainstream criticism of the U.S. criminal justice system. States spent $3.6 billion in 2010 alone enforcing marijuana possession laws, according to a report by the American Civil Liberties Union. The same study found that blacks are 3.7 times more likely to be arrested for marijuana possession that whites with similar usage rates. In areas with the most heightened detention disparities, blacks are 30 times more likely to be arrested.

“The policies of this failed war on drugs, which in reality is a war on people who happen to be poor, primarily black and brown, is a stain on the image of this society,” said the Rev. John E. Jackson, a member of Chicago’s Samuel DeWitt Proctor Conference of progressive African-American faith leaders, during a teleconference on Wednesday with a half-dozen religious leaders.

shucellpelicanbayA SHU cell, where prisoners spend 22 & 1/2 hours a day in solitary confinement, some for decades.

Criticism of U.S. drug policies has only intensified since two states — Colorado and Washington — legalized recreational marijuana. The Justice Department has allowed the states to move ahead with their laws despite a federal ban on cannabis use. Attorney General Eric Holder said on Tuesday he was “cautiously optimistic” about how the two states are proceeding with their pot laws.

The Obama administration has taken steps to curtail the burgeoning, and costly, U.S. prison population — fueled to a great extent by low-level marijuana possession arrests. In August, Holder announced that the federal government would not automatically impose charges that lead to mandatory sentences on low-level, nonviolent drug offenders.

And just last week, the U.S. Sentencing Commission unanimously approved recommendations from Holder that would shorten federal prison sentences for most drug dealers. The proposals would reduce sentencing guidelines across drug types. Someone caught with 2.2 pounds of heroin, for example, would serve on average one year less under the guidelines, from 51 to 63 months instead of the current 63 to 78 months.

If approved, the commission estimates its proposed changes would affect about 70 percent of federal drug trafficking defendants. That, in turn, would reduce the federal prison population by about 6,550 inmates over five years. The commission’s recommendations go to Congress for a vote in May. If approved, they would become law by Nov. 1.

Despite some opposition to lowering federal drug sentences — notably from Sen. Chuck Grassley, R-Iowa, ranking member of the Senate Judiciary Committee — the commission’s proposed amendment enjoys bipartisan backing and is expected to be approved, thanks in part to growing Republican support.

“We believe the greatest stimulus for the mass incarceration of our loved ones is the failed war on drugs that has spent billions and billions of dollars, and hundreds of thousands of lives, for primarily a public health issue,” said the Rev. Michael McBride, director of urban strategies at Lifelines to Healing in Berkeley, Calif. “Mass incarceration is the civil rights movement of our generation, and the faith community is at the forefront.”

Link to original article: Al Jazeera

* * *

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

My Letter to the Navy

1972391_629774337095129_635233175_nYou still have until Wednesday, April 16th at 1:59 AM CST to submit your public comments regarding the U.S. Navy’s “Northwest Training and Testing” Environmental Impact Statement.  My letter to the Navy appears below.

To:

U.S. Naval Command, Northwest
1101 Tautog Circle, Suite 203
Silverdale, WA  98315 -1101 

April 11, 2014

Dear United States Navy, 

I am writing to say that I think your EIS claiming zero (0) mortalities for marine mammals and other species of birds and fish from proposed Naval Training and Testing activities in the Pacific Northwest region is not only inaccurate, but also extremely dishonest.  It is disheartening that the U.S. Navy so disrespects both the public and the natural world, they would produce such a short-sighted and deceitful report.  As you are well aware, the Navy has more honestly predicted huge destruction and harm to all forms of marine life resulting from similar activities in other regions.  Whales, dolphins, porpoises, and other marine mammals are particularly vulnerable.

Though I know it probably seems outside the realm of possibility for the self-interest of the Navy, I want to propose the idea of establishing an international treaty banning submarine warfare entirely.

It has become plainly evident that the first beings to suffer from mankind’s madness for constant naval warfare will be the whales, dolphins and marine mammals.  They simply are not able to withstand this constant onslaught of underwater noise and shock waves in an arms race of stealth submarines, with the super high-powered sonar and other weapons that are used to detect and destroy them.

We either continue on the course towards the annihilation and extinction of the whales, or we come to our senses and ban submarine warfare entirely.

The Navy could take a pro-active role in enforcing such a treaty, by making sure no nation continues on the path of using submarines to patrol the oceans in the name of war.

I hope you will seriously consider this idea, and that such a treaty will be enacted while there are still whales and dolphins to share our oceans.

Respectfully,

David R. Gurney

<————>

Please write your own comments and mail them to this address:

Naval Facilities Engineering Command, Northwest
Attention: Ms. Kimberly Kler – NWTT EIS/OEIS Project Manager
1101 Tautog Circle, Suite 203
Silverdale, WA 98315-1101

Or, you can electronically submit your public comments on the Navy’s proposed Training and Testing in the Pacific Northwest, by going to their website:

http://nwtteis.com/GetInvolved/OnlineCommentForm.aspx

color-navy-whales-web

 

* * *

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Oil Lobby spending in California increases by 400 percent

The rise of oil industry spending documented in the report corresponds directly with the increase in fracking in Monterey Shale deposits in Kern County, coastal areas and Southern California ocean waters – and the creation of so-called “marine protected areas” that fail to protect the ocean from fracking, oil drilling, pollution, military testing and all human impacts other than fishing and gathering.

Oil companies have fracked offshore wells at least 203 times over the past 20 years in the ocean near California’s coast, from Seal Beach to the Santa Barbara Channel, according to a Freedom of Information Act Request and media investigation by the Associated Press and truthout.org last year.bil_oil_floods_the_capitol_4.1.14v2.pdf_600_

Oil Lobby spending in California increases by 400 percent

by Dan Bacher

A ground breaking report released on April 1, 2014 by the ACCE Institute and Common Cause reveals that Big Oil spent $123.6 million to lobby elected officials in California over the past 15 years, an increase of over 400 percent since the 1999-2000 legislative session, when the industry spent $4.8 million.

The report, “Big Oil Floods the Capitol: How California’s Oil Companies Funnel Funds Into the Legislature,” highlights the growing influence of the Oil and Gas Lobby in Sacramento, including the increasing power of the Western States Petroleum Association (WSPA). The analysis examines the broad and expanding scope of the oil and gas industry’s spending in Sacramento as the industry gears up to expand fracking (hydraulic fracturing) operations in California facilitated by the passage of Senator Fran Pavley’s Senate Bill 4 last September.

The report also examines historical campaign contributions by the largest firms in the oil and gas industry. Over the last fifteen years, Big Oil has spent $143.3 million on political candidates and campaigns – nearly $10 million per year and more than any other corporate lobby.

The report also exposes how the oil and gas lobby has spent nearly $15 million to influence Sacramento lawmakers halfway through the 2014-15 legislative session. The record is $25.5 million, set in 2011-12.

As one of the few journalists willing to expose the power of the oil industry in California in recent years, I am very pleased that Common Cause and ACCE have put together this invaluable report that confirms what I’ve been saying all along – that the oil industry has overwhelmed and corrupted the political process, including hijacking what passes for “marine protection” and “environmental protection” in California.

The report was unveiled as the arrests of three State Senators on criminal charges in recent months have put the spotlight on corruption and influence peddling at the State Capitol.

On March 29, the State Senate voted to suspend Senators Leland Yee, Ron Calderon and Rod Wright, who are being prosecuted in separate criminal cases, after Yee refused to resign. Yee was arrested on federal charges of accepting bribes and coordinating an international gun-running operation,revealed in an affidavit that read like a bizarre crime novel. (http://sacramento.cbslocal.com/2014/03/28/california-senate-votes-to-suspend-leland-yee/)

One of the three Senators, Rod Wright, received more oil industry money, $83,100, than any other legislator during the 15-year period, according to the report.

“On the heels of 3 California Senators facing separate accusations of influence peddling and unethical behavior, it has never been more important to shine a light on the money that industries like Big Oil spend to advance their agenda,” said Vivian Richardson, community leader and Board Chair of ACCE, in a news release announcing the publication of the report. “We’ve had enough of this ‘pay to play’ system in which money talks – it’s time for our elected officials to listen to the people of this state, and make Big Oil pay their fair share.”

“This report highlights a growing problem in Sacramento – the millions of dollars of campaign contributions and lobby spending by special interests in Sacramento, and the possible influence that goes along with it,” summed up Sarah Swanbeck, coauthor of the report and policy advocate for California Common Cause. “It is time for lawmakers to consider how these types of legal spending by special interests drown out the voice of average Californians and what legislative action can be taken to correct this imbalance.”

Chevron tops campaign contributions with $71.2 million

The report explains how key members of Big Oil. including Chevron, Exxon, Aera Energy and Occidental Petroleum, are some of the largest corporations in California. “And these big corporations spend big time,” Richardson and Swanbeck note.

The top five oil and gas industry campaign contributors from 1999 to 2013 were Chevron, $71.2 million; Aera Energy, $33.8 million; Occidental, $14.5 million; ConocoPhillips, $6.4 million; and Tesoro $3.4 million. Big Oil spent a whopping $143.3 million on political candidates and campaigns, nearly $10 million per year, over the past 15 years.

“Companies like Chevron and Aera have gone to great lengths to influence candidates and initiative campaigns in California elections,” the report states.

Environmental justice and indigenous groups accuse the San Ramon based-Chevron of environmental racism, ranging from the adverse health impacts of the pollution caused by the operation of its refinery in Richmond, California to its dumping of toxic waste in indigenous communities in the the Amazon River Basin in Ecuador.

The report also documents how individual legislators have received tens of thousands from Big Oil over their careers. Over the last 15 years, the top five currently serving legislative recipients are: (1) Senator Rod Wright ($83,100), (2) Assemblymember Isadore Hall, III ($80,600), (3) Senator Jean Fuller ($76,850), (4) Assemblymember Henry Perea ($73,050), and (5) Senator Bob Huff ($69,400).

This report profiles the top recipients, as well as those legislators who are facing a vote on the Oil and Gas Extraction Tax (Senate Bill 1017) this April.

But direct contributions are not the only way Big Oil dominates politics in Sacramento – the industry also spends millions on lobbying those same politicians every year.

Price tag for lobbying totalled $123.6 million

“In addition to its political contributions,” the report continues, “Big Oil exerts considerable influence lobbying in Sacramento. Big Oil employs high profile, high powered lobbyists to ensure their interests are represented.”

In the past 15 years, the price tag for these lobbyists has totaled $123.6 million. In 2013-2014 alone, the top lobbyist employer, the Western States Petroleum Association (WSPA), headed by President Catherine Reheis-Boyd, the former chair of the Marine Life Protection Act (MLPA) Initiative to create fake “marine protected areas” in Southern California, spent $4.7 million.

To make things worse, the oil lobby presence in Sacramento is growing, as evidenced by the industry’s successful campaign last year to defeat all fracking bills except one, Senator Fran Pavley’s Senate Bill 4, an oil industry-friendly bill that gives the green light to increased fracking in California. The legislation was opposed by the vast majority of conservation and environmental justice groups in California – but supported by the Natural Resources Defense Council, the Environmental Defense Fund and the California League of Conservation Voters until the the last minute, when they withdrew their support after amendments were added.

“So far during the 2013-2014 session, the Oil and Gas lobby has spent nearly $15 million in Sacramento,” the report revealed. “Only halfway through the session, and with expenditure rates typically increasing late in the legislative season when more bills are up for a final vote, California is on track to surpass the roughly $25.5 million spent on lobbying in the 2011-2012 legislative session.”

Similarly, the number of oil and gas industry lobbyists in Sacramento has gone from 22 lobbyist employer organizations registered with the FPPC in 1999-2000 to 32 registered sector for the current legislative session (2013-2014), according to the report.

Yet for the oil industry this money is mere chump change, the cost of doing business. Big Oil’s estimated profits in 2014 to date are $24,978,007,900, based on information from the Center for American Progress.

The 2013 profit totals for the big five oil companies combined – BP, Chevron, ConocoPhillips, Exxon Mobil, and Shell – were $93 billion, or $177,000 per minute. (http://www.americanprogress.org/issues/green/news/2014/02/10/83879/with-only-93-billion-in-profits-the-big-five-oil-companies-demand-to-keep-tax-breaks/)

As Big Oil spending rises, fracking increases

The rise of the oil industry spending documented in the report corresponds directly with the increase in fracking in Monterey Shale deposits in Kern County, coastal areas and Southern California ocean waters – and the creation of so-called “marine protected areas” that fail to protect the ocean from fracking, oil drilling, pollution military testing and all human impacts other than fishing and gathering.

Oil companies have fracked offshore wells at least 203 times over the past 20 years in the ocean near California’s coast, from Seal Beach to the Santa Barbara Channel, according to a Freedom of Information Act Request and media investigation by the Associated Press and truthout.org last year. (http://bigstory.ap.org/article/calif-finds-more-instances-offshore-fracking) Much of the fracking took place while WSPA President Reheis-Boyd was chairing the MLPA Initiative Blue Ribbon Task Force and serving on the Central Coast, North Central Coast and North Coast Task Forces.

The Common Cause/ACCE Institute report’s data and charts also make it perfectly clear that the oil industry spending on campaigns and lobbying correlates directly with the rise to power and influence by Reheis-Boyd and her service as a “marine guardian”on federal and state marine protected area panels, as revealed by the chart on page 12 of the document.

Mainstream media outlets have failed to cover one of biggest environmental scandals in California history, Reheis-Boyd’s chairing of the MLPA Initiative Blue Ribbon Task Force to create alleged “marine protected areas” in Southern California from 2009 to 2012, as well as her “service” on the Central Coast, North Central Coast and North Coast task forces from 2004 to 2012. MLPA Initiative advocates falsely portrayed the process as “open and transparent” and based on “science” when it was anything but. (http://www.counterpunch.org/2014/03/28/big-oil-lobbyist-serves-on-federal-marine-protected-areas-panel/)

The report also counteracts the attempts of state officials and corporate “environmental” NGOs to portray a false image of a “Green California” where no one single interest dominates. David Helvarg, in a recent article on the National Geographic website praising the so-called “marine protected areas” created under the privately-funded MLPA Initiative, claims:

“With its ports, the U.S. Navy, fishermen, surfers and the coastal tourism industry, marine science centers and more no single special interest can dominate ocean policy. And it is where you have single interests dictating policy in places like Louisiana with oil and gas or Florida with real-estate developers that you see coastal seas in decline,” said Helvarg. (http://newswatch.nationalgeographic.com/2014/03/21/the-ocean-comes-to-sacramento-2/)

This statement avoids addressing the fact that the oil industry is the largest corporate lobby in California, one that dominates environmental politics like no other industry does – and that California is much closer to Louisiana and Florida in its domination by corporate interests than some California politicians and corporate “environmentalists” would like to think.

You can read the full report at; http://d3n8a8pro7vhmx.cloudfront.net/makebankspay/pages/266/attachments/original/1396393828/Bil_Oil_Floods_the_Capitol_4.1.14v2.pdf

Brown’s tunnels will provide water for fracking

As the oil industry plans the expansion of fracking under Senate Bill 4, Governor Jerry Brown is fast tracking the widely-contested Bay Delta Conservation Plan (BDCP) to build the peripheral tunnels.The proposed tunnels would divert Sacramento River water for use by corporate agribusiness interests, Southern California water privateers and oil companies expanding fracking and steam injection operations. The construction of the twin tunnels would hasten the extinction of Central Valley salmon, Delta and longfin smelt, green sturgeon and other fish species, as well as imperil salmon and steelhead populations on the Trinity and Klamath rivers.

Restore the Delta and Food and Water Watch revealed on March 4 that much of the area that the oil industry could frack for oil and natural gas in California is located in and near toxic, drainage-impaired land farmed by corporate agribusiness interests on the west side of the San Joaquin Valley. (http://www.indybay.org/newsitems/2014/03/05/18751984.php)

The same Governor promoting the peripheral tunnels and the expansion of hydraulic fracturing recently declared a drought emergency in California. A broad coalition of environmentalists, fishermen and Tribal leaders is demanding immediate halt to water-intensive fracking.

According to Oil Change International, “This drought is already devastating farmers livelihoods, causing an increased risk of wildfires, and threatening our water supplies. So why is the Governor still allowing fracking to take place? Fracking wells can consume between 2 and 10 MILLION gallons of water in their lifetime.”

In spite of false claims by the mainstream media and state officials that California is a “green state” and an “environmental leader,” the Golden State has become an “oilogarchy.”

If you want to take action and help fight the flood of dirty energy money in California, go to: http://www.bigoilbrown.org/#take-action

 

* * *

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Diving Deep

Beaked whale dives nearly 2 miles beneath the ocean – a record

NAVY WHALESAn adult female beaked whale off the Kona coast, Hawaii.  Photo courtesy Robin W. Baird, AP

By Deborah Netburn, LA Times
March 27, 2014

 
Scientists have found a 20-foot whale that can dive an astonishing 1.8 miles beneath the ocean – a record for a mammal. The record was reported this week in the journal Plos One.

The miraculous, extreme-diving whale is known as Cuvier’s beaked whale (Ziphius cavirostris). Members of this species can be found in most oceans throughout the world, except for in the coldest arctic regions.

To survive the immense pressure changes it faces as it moves down the water column, Cuvier’s beaked whales have evolved lungs and a trachea that collapse completely in the depths of the ocean and then pop back open as the whale moves to the surface to breathe.

To help the whale go for as much as two hours without breathing, it has so much of the oxygen-binding protein myoglobin in its muscle tissue that its muscles look dark purple, almost black.

“It is a really exciting species,” said Erin Falcone, a biologist at Cascadia Research Collective in Olympia, Wash., and an author of the study. “They have the same basic needs that we do, but they function in this totally alien environment.”

Although Cuvier’s beaked whales have a wide distribution, they are still a bit of a mystery to scientists. They live far from shore, and spend most of their time deep beneath the ocean, making them difficult to observe.

For this study, Falcone and her coauthors tracked eight whales over the course of three months off the coast of Southern California, not far from San Clemente Island. Using modified tranquilizer guns, the researchers shot satellite-linked tags on the dorsal fin of the whales. The tags transmitted information about where the whales went, as well as how far beneath the ocean they swam.

The deepest dive recorded was to a depth of 1.8 miles. The longest dive (made by a different whale) was two hours and 17 minutes. The average depth of all the dives recorded was .87 miles. The average length of all the dives was 67.4 minutes.

“We were pretty surprised when we saw the data,” Falcone said. “The previous dive record of these whales was 1,188 meters (.7 miles), which was plenty deep. We spent a little time making sure the tag was functioning properly just to be sure the data was right.”

She added that its possible that the whales may be able to go even deeper than what her team observed.

“In the area where our animals are, the bottom depth isn’t much deeper than 1.8 miles,” she said. “In deeper water, they may go well beyond that.”
 

* * *

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off